So that’s kind I just don’t think there will be just one AI. I certainly don’t think there should be one company
controlling AI. I think you want all sorts of different kiribati email list 100000 contact leads things to exist, and all sorts of different people to
create all sorts of applications with it. I mean, some of them are serious and help you think about things.
I think, like anything on the internet
A lot of it is going to be hilarious and entertaining. People will create some interesting
AI agents and they will spread like content. It’s similar to when you share a short video or a clip and say “this thing is
hilarious.” In the future, a lot of entertainment will be interactive in nature, where someone will build
an experience or an AI and then show it to someone else, who will find it entertaining.
But for example, I don’t necessarily interact with that AI every day. It’s more like, “Okay, this thing is
interesting for five minutes,” and then you pass it breakthroughs in h5 website production on to your friends. So, I don’t know.
I think you want all these different things to exist in the world. In my opinion, the best way to make sure it doesn’t get out of hand is to make sure it’s distributed fairly evenly.
Host: I think the concern people have is not even whether it will be distributed evenly
Rather, if it becomes sentient and starts operating autonomously, the common concern is that we will
become obsolete, that humans are essentially creating philippines numbers a more advanced version of our higher
intelligence that will be powered by quantum computing and connected to nuclear reactors.
This new intelligence is expected to have powers that surpass human capabilities.
Well, first of all, they’ve demonstrated that AI has learned to be programmed.
I mean, that’s one of the things that OpenAI said. Oh, and yes, they are learning how to write their own code So that’s kind.